[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

2006-03-29 Thread bje at sources dot redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-30 03:06 --- Fixed with this patch (and verified): 2006-03-05 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR binutils/2338 * dwarf2.c (loadable_section): New struct.

[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

2006-03-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

2006-02-23 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-22 18:14 --- This patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00295.html should work much better. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2338 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

2006-02-19 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-19 19:49 --- I think it may be a compiler bug. Please upload your mm/vmscan.o if "objdump -d -S" doesn't work. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2338 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are

[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

2006-02-19 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-19 20:16 --- The gcc bug is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2338 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

2006-02-19 Thread 76306 dot 1226 at compuserve dot com
--- Additional Comments From 76306 dot 1226 at compuserve dot com 2006-02-19 10:59 --- The posted patch almost works. Instead of returning the wrong line number info, it now returns no info much of the time. :( BTW an easier test is to do 'objdump -d -S mm/vmscan.o' and see if the sour

[Bug binutils/2338] objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

2006-02-14 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-14 19:30 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00169.html -- What|Removed |Added