https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23418
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23418
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_31-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=01683b308a016c49418aee27241389bd2560e0f1
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23418
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=11a322db5c8bc23009e97af30180d6b14d86dbd3
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23418
--- Comment #3 from bd170260 ---
After regxmm, regymm, regzmm were combined into regsimd it's impossible to
distinguish if xmmword/ymmword/zmmword can represent a memory reference when
operand specification contains SIMD register. For example
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23418
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
vcvtps2uqq has the same issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
