https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Additional Comments From zippel at linux-m68k dot org 2006-07-28 17:32
---
BTW while looking through the source it may make sense to disable the dot
completely on m68k as part of the name. It's not really valid as part of any
symbol name, e.g. label.w has a special meaning.
Although
Hi Roman,
You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes
foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using foo .l would be even more confusing.
OK, so presumably a workaround is to provide individual macros with the
names foo.b, foo.w and so on, rather than just one macro.
The point is that gas
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-26 10:41
---
Subject: Re: macro name syntax changed
Hi Roman,
You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes
foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using foo .l would be even more confusing.
OK, so presumably a workaround
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 17:01
---
Subject: Re: New: macro name syntax changed
Hi Zippel,
Until at least 2.15 as accepted a macro like this:
.macro foo size,arg,arg2
move\size \arg,\arg2
.endm
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848
--- You are receiving this mail because:
