[Bug gas/31752] gas: Support \+ in .rept/.irp/.irpc directives

2024-06-10 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31752 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gas/31752] gas: Support \+ in .rept/.irp/.irpc directives

2024-06-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31752 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1e3c814459d83247707f8c9840ac660726cfaae0 commit 1e3c814459d83247707f8c9840ac660726cfaae

[Bug gas/31752] gas: Support \+ in .rept/.irp/.irpc directives

2024-05-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31752 --- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f29ebbe3be5c2a4400ad8b89a8f399ead4448148 commit f29ebbe3be5c2a4400ad8b89a8f399ead444814

[Bug gas/31752] gas: Support \+ in .rept/.irp/.irpc directives

2024-05-17 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31752 --- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song --- In the absence of the feature, there are a few ways, but none achieves great efficiency or convenience. For example, we can define a macro that expands to a sequence of strings: 0, (0+1), ((0+1)+1), (((0+1

[Bug gas/31752] gas: Support \+ in .rept/.irp/.irpc directives

2024-05-17 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31752 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com -- You are r