[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2015-09-07 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 --- Comment #8 from Cary Coutant --- > Dynamic linking is OK - but the symtab from gold doesn't have any symbol > versions even on glibc symbols, so it is a different thing. > > I think this bug can be closed, thanks That's correct -- gold

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2015-09-07 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2015-09-02 Thread jgunthorpe at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 --- Comment #7 from Jason Gunthorpe --- Hi Cary, HEAD behaves differently than the version in Vivid, but the result is not identical to ld. I tested c74be520ba8ed2d013d43916b923b837294343cc. $ /tmp/binutils-gdb/build/gold/ld-new

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2015-09-01 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||18703 Assignee|ian at airs

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2015-09-01 Thread jgunthorpe at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 Jason Gunthorpe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgunthorpe at gmail dot com ---

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2012-01-08 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-01-09 01:54:39 UTC --- See PR 12261 for a related issue. I think the problem is more complex than you are describing. I would be happy to hear otherwise. Sorry for not mentioning

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2012-01-07 Thread jrnieder at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2012-01-07 23:18:15 UTC --- Bug causes spurious references to the wrong version of symbols (namely the unversioned symbol), meaning ld.gold produces output and exits with status 0

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2011-12-19 Thread jrnieder at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2011-12-20 07:14:36 UTC --- Created attachment 6120 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6120 DSO with versioned and unversioned lzma_code symbol (Debian liblzma5

[Bug gold/13521] ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default version

2011-12-19 Thread jrnieder at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2011-12-20 07:17:03 UTC --- Created attachment 6121 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6121 output from ld.gold -o output.gold test.o liblzma.so.5.0.0, which