subject:"\[Bug gold\/20114\] Partial relro support for s390x gold"

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-30 Thread maamountk at hotmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #12 from maamountki --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #11) > Ok. Having a linker script with just a .got continues to work with your > patch? Yes. My LinuxONE Community Cloud VM has been expired I can not pull the

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-30 Thread krebbel at linux dot ibm.com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to maamountki from comment #10) > (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #8) > > > For S/390 it would mean that non of the existing linker scripts > > would continue to work with Gold

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-30 Thread maamountk at hotmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #10 from maamountki --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #8) > For S/390 it would mean that non of the existing linker scripts > would continue to work with Gold after that change. For S/390 gold does not have .got.plt

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-30 Thread krebbel at linux dot ibm.com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to maamountki from comment #7) > Thinking of replacing the new layout with this one > > +--+ > |.got[0]: DYNAMIC | <---

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-30 Thread krebbel at linux dot ibm.com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to maamountki from comment #6) ... > Yes I do and it does not. > .got and .got.plt must be set properly in linker srcript to get it work > otherwise a segmentation fault will be produced. I

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-29 Thread maamountk at hotmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #7 from maamountki --- Thinking of replacing the new layout with this one +--+ |.got[0]: DYNAMIC | <--- _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ .got

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-29 Thread maamountk at hotmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #6 from maamountki --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #5) > One difference to the ld implementation is that you appear to always use the > new got layout. ld uses the new layout only for partial relro to keep impact >

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-04-29 Thread krebbel at linux dot ibm.com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to maamountki from comment #4) Looks good to me. However, I'm not a Gold maintainer. One difference to the ld implementation is that you appear to always use the new got layout. ld uses the

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-03-26 Thread maamountk at hotmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 maamountki changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #11439|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gold/20114] Partial relro support for s390x gold

2019-03-21 Thread maamountk at hotmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114 --- Comment #3 from maamountki --- This patch does not follow IBM Z scheme, I'm adjusting the patch to be compatible with IBM Z scheme. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.