[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2012-12-03 Thread ma...@linux-mips.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2012-12-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 16:38:00 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ma...@sourceware.org2012-12-03 16:37:51 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elfxx-mips.c Lo

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-25 10:11 --- Hi Bill, The simple.o file that I created must be different from the one that you are using. Please could you try uploading it to this PR again. Say as a compressed tarball for example ? Cheers Nick --

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-15 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
h->non_elf = 0; h->def_regular = 1; h->type = STT_OBJECT; if (! bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h)) return FALSE; } } } -----Original Message- From: Tovrea, George W (US SSA) Sent: Tuesday, S

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-15 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
W (US SSA) Subject: [Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:26 --- Hi Bill, > Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, Because without it I have to create a compile

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
A) Subject: [Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:26 --- Hi Bill, > Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, Because without it I have to create a compiler and

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:26 --- Hi Bill, > Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, Because without it I have to create a compiler and then compile simple.cc. Plus I have to hope that I am using the same set of compiler

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:22 --- Created an attachment (id=4197) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4197&action=view) Work around assertion failure -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 --- You are r

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
ces, the binary is available at http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/download.cgi. -Original Message- From: nickc at redhat dot com [mailto:sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 5:38 AM To: Tovrea, George W (US SSA) Subject: [Bug ld/10629] GNU l

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 12:37 --- Hi George, Would it be possible for you to upload the sample.o and libxerces-c.so.28.0 files so that we can try to reproduce this bug ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added