--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-26 13:49
---
Hi Richard,
> Why rename it to "target_specific_optimizations"? It's still relaxation.
Because for some targets the command line option is used to enable other
optimizations, not just relaxation.
I have checked
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26
13:45 ---
Subject: Bug 10956
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-11-26 13:45:26
Modified files:
ld : ChangeLog ld.h ld.texinfo ldlang.c ld
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 16:17
---
- bfd_boolean relax;
+ signed int disable_target_specific_optimizations;
Why rename it to "target_specific_optimizations"? It's still relaxation.
I do like the macros though. You could stand to use them i
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-24 15:16
---
Hi Richard,
How about this patch ?
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-24 15:15
---
Created an attachment (id=4414)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4414&action=view)
Implement --no-relax as a generic linker command line option
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
