[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-October/113795.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #9 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > > Hi H.J. > > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > > > > Here is the proposal: > > > > > It has been moved at:

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com -- You

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > Hi H.J. > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > > Here is the proposal: > > > It has been moved at: > > > >

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > The proposal is at > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/gcc/lto/mixed-IR/mixed-IR.pdf Here is the proposal: Link with mixed IR/non-IR objects * 2 kinds of object

[Bug ld/12291] ld -r doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian

[Bug ld/12291] ld -r doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-21 22:27:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) ld.ian (gold with patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-01/msg00270.html) silently uses non-IR part of prog.o What does

[Bug ld/12291] ld -r doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-01-22 00:43:24 UTC --- Does prog.o contain both IR and non-IR sections? No. I think a new bug report should be opened for gold. When I use ld.bfd (or ld.hjl) for

[Bug ld/12291] ld -r doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug ld/12291] ld -r doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-06 23:01:17 UTC --- One approach -- We generate a prog.o that contains an object that is the relocation of real foo.o and main.o (used if prog.o is linked without IR support),