http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
--- Comment #3 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
Hi Ma,
I do not think that refetching the addend in the ABS8 and ABS16
cases is the right thing to do. There could be other relocations that
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
--- Comment #4 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
Created attachment 7337 [details]
Proposed patch
===
This patch can solve the abs8 problem.In fact,I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|gas |ld
--
You are receiving