[Bug ld/22655] gcc unable to compile assembly with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655 Jeremi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/22655] gcc unable to compile assembly with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655 --- Comment #6 from Zach --- Ah, thanks. Got it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

[Bug ld/22655] gcc unable to compile assembly with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22655] gcc unable to compile assembly with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655 --- Comment #4 from calculuswhiz at gmail dot com --- Ah, good. Compiles successfully with -no-pie. I don't really understand why this works though. Why don't I need this flag in 32 bit? Why didn't I need this in the previous version? Was

[Bug ld/22655] gcc unable to compile assembly with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug ld/22655] gcc unable to compile assembly with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655 --- Comment #2 from calculuswhiz at gmail dot com --- You mean use the verbose flag? Because I don't call `as` and `ld` myself. It's breaking at `ld`. I have other test programs as well in the above repo, if you find those easier to look at.

[Bug ld/22655] gcc unable to compile assembly with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING