[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 Jeremi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0a99d34019855d0dafa171796826efb0ff3d18b7

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8a1b824af786989f879ab1421a4279f60bba141a commit

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- > Please try: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-01/msg00293.html As a quick test, I've just rebuilt binutils with that patch and ran the failing LTO test and

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- [...] > What are the commend-line options passed to ld? ld -plugin ./liblto_plugin.so -plugin-opt=./lto-wrapper \ -plugin-opt=-fresolution=-plugin-save-temps.res

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #6) > > --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- > [...] > > Please do > > > > 1. Get users/hjl/lto-mixed/master branch and build/install it. > > 2. Pass -v -save-temps

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- [...] > Please do > > 1. Get users/hjl/lto-mixed/master branch and build/install it. > 2. Pass -v -save-temps -Wl,-plugin-save-temps to gcc > This should save all

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #4) > > --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- > [...] > >> The static tests fail because there are no libc.a and libm.a on Solaris, > >> so full-static linking just isn't

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- [...] >> The static tests fail because there are no libc.a and libm.a on Solaris, >> so full-static linking just isn't possible. Testing static linking when >> the

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #2) > > --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- > > A couple questions: > > > > 1. Do all tests under ld/testsuite/ld-i386 pass on Solaris? > > No, but that's a preexisting

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- > A couple questions: > > 1. Do all tests under ld/testsuite/ld-i386 pass on Solaris? No, but that's a preexisting condition: FAIL: Build libno-plt-1b.so FAIL: No PLT

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- A

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.30 -- You are receiving this mail