[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 Jeremi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #23 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #22 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e513bd38a6b91401947d90ba5f301f01d3991b8e

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #21 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou --- > Please give it a try on Solaris. I just tried gcc mainline with the top of the binutils 2.30 branch on Solaris 11.4: worked like a charm. Thanks.

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #19 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #18 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bb363086e7743506d78bc6b1e56face0fb1fc93f

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou --- > Yes, TLS in PIE is broken on Linux/Sparc, which is different from > 8500 GCC testsuite regressions on Solaris/Sparc. Note that I also have 8500 GCC testsuite regressions on SPARC/Linux so I think that

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #14) > Created attachment 10754 [details] > Testcase for the incorrect TLS transition in PIE mode > > To be applied to the source tree, then > make -k check

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 10754 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10754=edit Testcase for the incorrect TLS transition in PIE mode To be applied to the source tree, then make -k check

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- > I fixed PR 22728. Please try master branch again. How could a Solaris fix be of any help on Linux exactly? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > This could be a dup of PR 22728. Please try > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-01/msg00278.html I fixed PR 22728. Please try master branch again. -- You

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) > > This implies that ld testsuite coverage in binutils for Sparc is very > > poor. Can you extract some ld tesctcases from GCC tests? > > Are

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- This could be a dup of PR 22728. Please try https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-01/msg00278.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) > > This implies that ld testsuite coverage in binutils for Sparc is very > > poor. Can you extract some ld tesctcases from GCC tests? > > Are

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > This implies that ld testsuite coverage in binutils for Sparc is very > poor. Can you extract some ld tesctcases from GCC tests? Are gcc.dg/torture/tls/run-gd.c or gcc.dg/torture/tls/run-ld.c good

[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on SPARC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc-sun-solaris2.11 |sparc*-*-*