https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fa1477dc34e6ce19b90ff0171074c295133730a3
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #13 from Stephen Casner ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #12)
> You appear to be submitting the same patch as Jan... :-)
>
> The patch has the same problem as outlined here:
>
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #12 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Stephen Casner from comment #11)
Hi Stephen
> Here is a patch against a current git pull that I believe includes all of
> the requested changes.
You appear to be submitting the same patch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #11 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12448
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12448=edit
Completed patch including tests and doc
Here is a patch against a current git pull that I believe includes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Stephen Casner from comment #9)
Hi Stephen,
> Another solution, perhaps the most straightforwad one, would be to change
> the code in adjust_o_magic() to not pad the size of the data section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Casner ---
Another solution, perhaps the most straightforwad one, would be to change the
code in adjust_o_magic() to not pad the size of the data section if the size of
the bss section is zero.
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #8 from Stephen Casner ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5)
> The important issue is the extract symbols failure in the script.exp tests:
>
> Running ../../ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/script.exp ...
> [...]
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Stephen
(In reply to Stephen Casner from comment #6)
> One side question you might be able to answer for me: where is "fail"
> implemented? I searched but could not find it.
Look in:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #6 from Stephen Casner ---
The key point I did not know is that failures were expected. I have been
studying the detail log and the test scripts (I have programmed in Tcl, but it
was about 30 years ago) to see why FAIL: extract
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Stephen,
Judging by the attached log, you seem to have gotten the hang of running the
linker testsuite. Do not worry that there are quite a few failures for the
pdp11-aout target. This is fairly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12414
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12414=edit
ld make check summary log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12412
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12412=edit
make check summary log
I should add that I did run "make check" without any other preparation with the
results
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Casner ---
I could use some guidance regarding running the testsuite. After reading the
binutils porting document I have installed dejagnu, but I don't know what
information is needed in the global config, for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
15 matches
Mail list logo
