https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
--- Comment #5 from Nelson Chu ---
Oh I forgot to add the PR27433 in the comment, so it doesn’t show which commit
fixes this PR.
commit ebdcad3fddf6ec21f6d4dcc702379a12718cf0c4
Refs: [master], {upstream-write/master},
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
--- Comment #3 from Nelson Chu ---
Created attachment 13232
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13232=edit
proposed solution v2
Fixed the conflicts since the v1 patch is too old.
After applying this patch, the "call
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13231|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
--- Comment #2 from Nelson Chu ---
The attached is the proposed solution. We use a new boolean "restart_relax" to
determine if we need to re-run the whole relax passes again from 0 to 2. Once
we have deleted the code between relax pass 0 to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv*-*-*
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
--- Comment #1 from Nelson Chu ---
Created attachment 13231
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13231=edit
proposed solution
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.