[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #18 from Andreas K. Huettel --- https://gitweb.gentoo.org/fork/binutils-gdb.git/log/?h=gentoo/binutils-2.40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Andreas K. Huettel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org ---

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #16 from Michael Matz --- Yes, the hacky patch is fine for you to use, it won't introduce further problems (knock on wood! :) ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #15 from Sam James --- Thank you! Do you think the hacky patch (not the one committed) would be good enough for us to backport downstream for 2.40? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Michael Matz : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=670c91c0c5eb3fb16d42fe5b2d48a33c64e3ec52 commit

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- Not tested the patch yet, but Matz, I'd like to say thanks for the insightful explanation. Really appreciated! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #11 from Michael Matz --- The old (insertion-sort) code only added something to the output section list if the considered section wasn't already either discarded or linked (by being part of a group for instance). That is done by

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |matz at suse dot de

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40) since af31506c31a59a6edbb13498d6075fa704b801cd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) |bfd very slow (> 4 minutes)