https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f1837d9c3f2dc2a5c232f4eae4c4bd5a7f77baf8
commit f1837d9c3f2dc2a5c232f4eae4c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
--- Comment #5 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> Created attachment 15115 [details]
> Proposed patch
Sorry for the late reply but the documentation and test change looks great!
There is a minor typo below
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15114|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
It is always the way - you post a patch and then immediately realise that you
have forgotten something. In this case my patch updates the description of the
FILL directive in the linker documentation, but
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 15114
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15114&action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0)
> A side effect possibly from this commit is that 0x literals have different
> behaviors from decimal literals and expressions.
>
> .text : { *(.text) } =0x90
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30865
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
