--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1306 is|0 |1
obsolete||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3191
-
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-20 09:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=1307)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1307&action=view)
preprocessed sources and objects from gcc-4.1/4.2
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3191
-
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-20 09:24 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > It looks like a gcc bug. See
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29146
>
> No it does not.
> What version of GCC did you produce this object f
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20
06:43 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It looks like a gcc bug. See
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29146
No it does not.
What version of GCC did you produce this object file?
And how did you build GCC
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-20 05:50 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> A patch is posted at
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-09/msg00187.html
i'll test it today...
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3191
--- You are receivin
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-20 05:49 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It looks like a gcc bug. See
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29146
i don't think so. `-gdwarf-2' option allows gcc to use dwarf3 features.
--
http://sourceware.org/bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-20 05:28 ---
It looks like a gcc bug. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29146
--
What|Removed |Added
