http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13359
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org 2011-12-19 21:14:45 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_22-branch
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-12-19 21:14:40
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org 2011-12-19 21:14:46 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_22-branch
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-12-19 21:14:40
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245
--- Comment #16 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org 2011-12-19 21:14:52 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_22-branch
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-12-19 21:14:40
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13249
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org 2011-12-19 21:14:52 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_22-branch
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-12-19 21:14:40
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13163
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org 2011-12-19 21:14:51 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_22-branch
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-12-19 21:14:40
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13365
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-12-19 23:30:39
UTC ---
Of course one can only do this if there are no comparisons of function
pointers. And that means that it can only be done if the symbols are not
visible
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13366
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-12-19 23:31:56
UTC ---
I think it will be relatively difficult for the linker to safely and reliably
detect cases where this packing is valid. The packing may only be done if the
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521
Bug #: 13521
Summary: ld.gold prefers unversioned symbol over default
version
Product: binutils
Version: 2.23 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2011-12-20
07:14:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 6120
-- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6120
DSO with versioned and unversioned lzma_code symbol (Debian liblzma5
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13521
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2011-12-20
07:17:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 6121
-- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6121
output from ld.gold -o output.gold test.o liblzma.so.5.0.0, which
10 matches
Mail list logo