[Bug binutils/20667] New: [libopcodes][Aarch64] IC ivau omits register operand if it's the zero register

2016-10-04 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20667 Bug ID: 20667 Summary: [libopcodes][Aarch64] IC ivau omits register operand if it's the zero register Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/19660] [libopcodes] [x86] REP prefixes shown incorrectly

2016-10-04 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19660 --- Comment #4 from njholcomb at wi dot rr.com --- Coming back to this, my concern is that outputting instructions with prefixes where the prefixes cause the instruction to be undefined is misleading. If the output of the decoder is intended

[Bug binutils/20666] New: [libopcodes][Aarch64] BFI instruction decoded as bad BFC instruction

2016-10-04 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20666 Bug ID: 20666 Summary: [libopcodes][Aarch64] BFI instruction decoded as bad BFC instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug binutils/19660] [libopcodes] [x86] REP prefixes shown incorrectly

2016-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19660 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---