https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Igor,
>> You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the
> your solution doesn't work.
> GAS command line on SPARC not accepted -Wa,--no-relax
> we can use -no-relax
Oops -
Hi Igor,
>> You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the
> your solution doesn't work.
> GAS command line on SPARC not accepted -Wa,--no-relax
> we can use -no-relax
Oops - I had too many dashes, sorry about that.
> - but it is not fixed my problem
Well, it does
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694
Bug ID: 20694
Summary: PDP11 TARGET_PAGE_SIZE is incorrect
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692
--- Comment #2 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> (In reply to Igor Kozhukhov from comment #0)
>
> > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:75: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.volatile'
> > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:245: Error: unknown
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20703
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704
--- Comment #1 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu ---
The following bytes produce only the opcode when decoded. The bytes themselves
do not appear to be a valid instruction.
Bytes: 0f 7a 20 72
Output: ptest
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20703
Bug ID: 20703
Summary: [gas][x86] Cannot assemble certain registers for
vpmuludq instruction
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704
Bug ID: 20704
Summary: [libopcodes][x86]
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704
nholcomb at wisc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[libopcodes][x86] |[libopcodes][x86] Decodes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20693
Bug ID: 20693
Summary: kernel build error on ppc64le
Product: binutils
Version: 2.28 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20693
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
It happens on all archs with an empty archive.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20699
Bug ID: 20699
Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Decodes invalid 32-bit address for a
64-bit MPX instruction
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19660
--- Comment #6 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu ---
The fact that the rep prefixes cannot be used with these opcodes is not the
same as machine dependencies. This instruction will be invalid everywhere, so
it should be decoded as invalid.
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20700
Bug ID: 20700
Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for xbegin
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20701
Bug ID: 20701
Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for phaddw
instruction
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20702
Bug ID: 20702
Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for sysret
instruction due to data16 prefix
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710
Bug ID: 20710
Summary: [libopcodes][x86] libopcodes produces "(bad)" decode
for certain sal instructions
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20705
Bug ID: 20705
Summary: [libopcodes][x86] VEX masking register name lacks
formatting, cannot assemble
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20706
Bug ID: 20706
Summary: [libopcodes][x86] invalid quadword XOP instructions
using %ymm registers
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20709
Bug ID: 20709
Summary: [libopcodes][x86]Failure to disassemble variant
encoding of test instruction
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
21 matches
Mail list logo
