[Bug ld/26090] is_relocatable_executable isn't handled correctly

2020-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26090 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Incorrect exclude.exp |is_relocatable_executable

[Bug ld/21703] The first symbol definition is overwritten by second definition when --allow-multiple-definition is provieded

2020-06-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21703 --- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=597344c9a4a110b662ed04fe115e6f887b42d366 commit

[Bug ld/26083] cris linker generate zero sized PLTRELSZ

2020-06-07 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26083 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from

[Bug ld/26090] is_relocatable_executable isn't handled correctly for PIC output

2020-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26090 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|is_relocatable_executable |is_relocatable_executable

[Bug ld/26090] New: Incorrect exclude.exp

2020-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26090 Bug ID: 26090 Summary: Incorrect exclude.exp Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/26083] cris linker generate zero sized PLTRELSZ

2020-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26083 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1) > > I don't mind to have it that way, but I'm not sure it's as easy to remove as > just an extra if-clause in elf_cris_finish_dynamic_sections, as room has to >

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Joel Anderson from comment #7) > I do think that it is important to note that the two new patches alter > windmc behavior to accept a file where the period is immediately followed by > a EOF

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12596|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|26082 | --- Comment #4 from Ralf Habacker

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|26088 | Referenced Bugs:

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12598|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12599|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread joelanderson333 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #10 from Joel Anderson --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #8) > Can you say from which version on this behavior was changed ? I just tested with the executable packaged with the Windows SDK for Windows 7 (7.1) and