[Bug ld/20428] ld powerpc64le NULL deref in ppc_get_stub_entry when linking code in not-executable sections

2016-08-01 Thread npiggin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20428 --- Comment #1 from npiggin at gmail dot com --- For better or worse, Linux kernel wants to do this in order to run a test case for non-executable mapping of data. Other architectures seem to work, and gold with powerpc64le works with my

[Bug ld/20428] ld powerpc64le NULL deref in ppc_get_stub_entry when linking code in not-executable sections

2016-08-01 Thread npiggin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20428 npiggin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --

[Bug ld/20428] ld powerpc64le NULL deref in ppc_get_stub_entry when linking code in not-executable sections

2016-08-01 Thread npiggin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20428 npiggin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g

[Bug ld/20428] New: ld powerpc64le NULL deref in ppc_get_stub_entry when linking code in not-executable sections

2016-08-01 Thread npiggin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20428 Bug ID: 20428 Summary: ld powerpc64le NULL deref in ppc_get_stub_entry when linking code in not-executable sections Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status:

[Bug ld/17739] Assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-sh.c:4504 on sh4 when compiling Qt5

2016-08-01 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17739 --- Comment #19 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #18) > So the patch seems to work. I will do another full rebuild and see whether I > can build qtwebkit now. I can confirm that qtwebkit

[Bug gas/20427] Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables

2016-08-01 Thread stefan.teleman at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Teleman --- All gas tests on Solaris SPARC pass after applying the proposed patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug gas/20427] Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables

2016-08-01 Thread stefan.teleman at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427 Stefan Teleman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug gas/20427] Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables

2016-08-01 Thread stefan.teleman at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427 Stefan Teleman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stefan.teleman at oracle dot com

[Bug gas/20427] New: Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables

2016-08-01 Thread stefan.teleman at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427 Bug ID: 20427 Summary: Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status:

Re: as allows too many registers for vldm/vstm (ARMv7/8)

2016-08-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
could you file a bug please here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ make sure to include a small test case that can be assembled -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

[Bug binutils/17512] libbfd/binutils: crashes on fuzzed samples

2016-08-01 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---