[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 --- Comment #10 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #9) > My assumption is that even if inode 0 is valid for the filesystem it is > extremely unlikely that this value will just happen to be used for an > assembler

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #8) > On XFS, inode 0 can be used for regular files created by applications. Only > newer versions have code in them to avoid inode 0. Some old applications >

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com ---

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c3533c4c7c5db84b27e4dc8994a3c3a893077c03 commit

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Pekka, > No, MinGW populates the st_dev field with some apparently non-random value In which case I will go with the original patch. I know that technically a valid file might have an inode of 0, but

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 --- Comment #4 from Pekka Seppänen --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > Hi Pekka, > > Can you confirm that MingW always returns 0 for the st_dev field as well ? > (I assume that it does, but I would like to make sure). If so

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Pekka, > so I guess the > attached patch shouldn't be applied but one that fails only if the st_dev is > the same, too Can you confirm that MingW always returns 0 for the st_dev field as well ? (I

[Bug ld/23169] IFUNC pointer should be allowed in executable

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/23169] IFUNC pointer should be allowed in executable

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4ec0995016801cc5d5cf13baf6e10163861e6852 commit

[Bug ld/23162] assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23162 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9bc935ef3380a2d471b9447e2bf8e61297654e2f commit

[Bug ld/23162] assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/23153] gas: distinct input and output files are not properly detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153 --- Comment #2 from Pekka Seppänen --- Hi Nick, My apologies for a late response; The patch appears to work just fine as expected. However, it just occured to me that IEEE Std 1003.1 (2016 edition), i.e. the POSIX specs, state that ``The