https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I believe the security reason for separate-code is the risk that rodata
could contain byte patterns that can be used as a Spectre gadget if branch
predication state is manipulated so
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Felix von Leitner from comment #4)
> > Hey Nick, thanks for the quick help!
> >
> > With -z noseparate-code I'm down to 9512 bytes. That is much better but
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23566
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2cd65cb935bcf1511c7e7bb77ce7bd46234300db
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
--- Comment #24 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b0ceb98aec8e1ab610deea9fee9ee75c5911bbc0
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23566
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #6 from Felix von Leitner ---
-N makes .text and .data the same LOAD program header, which is
read+write+execute, so that is actually a real security problem.
It does make the binary smaller, but the cost is too high.
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eb at emlix dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Felix,
> With -z noseparate-code I'm down to 9512 bytes. That is much better but still
> more than gold produces. And looking at the binary in a hex editor still shows
> a ton of padding bytes after
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #4 from Felix von Leitner ---
Hey Nick, thanks for the quick help!
With -z noseparate-code I'm down to 9512 bytes. That is much better but still
more than gold produces. And looking at the binary in a hex editor still shows
a ton
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
Bug ID: 23567
Summary: much larger static binaries compared to a few months
ago
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23566
Bug ID: 23566
Summary: emultempl/elf32.em and gcc 8.2: -Werror uninitialized
value
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061
--- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton ---
Extra patch applied.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=334d4ced42d3d54a70a19f1323ff41c5a5f4ff5e
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061
--- Comment #7 from Sandro Mani ---
Hi Nick, thanks, fixes the segfault.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
