[Bug binutils/25589] LTO parallel build fails with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find .lto.o: No such file or directory"

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25589 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug ld/25591] Should /DISCARD/ : { *(.symtab) *(.strtab) } work?

2020-03-04 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25591 --- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song --- SECTIONS { .pltfoo : { a.o(.plt) }} can rename the synthetic section .plt, so I don't see a problem allowing an input section description to match a synthetic section. -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug ld/25591] Should /DISCARD/ : { *(.symtab) *(.strtab) } work?

2020-03-04 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25591 --- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song --- SECTIONS { /DISCARD/ : { *(.symtab) } } deletes .symtab SECTIONS { /DISCARD/ : { *(.strtab) } } deletes .strtab When combined, it is like --strip-all (normally there is no need for .symtab_shndx) /DISCARD

[Bug binutils/25572] /dev/null should be excluded from 'files are the same' check

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25572 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug binutils/25629] objcopy : SIGSEGV in filter_symbols ( objcopy.c:1584 )

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25629 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/25629] objcopy : SIGSEGV in filter_symbols ( objcopy.c:1584 )

2020-03-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25629 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d1faf7ca0a9ecbc7f89998638e5cf08d3dca6e84 commit d1faf7ca0a9ecbc7f89998638e5cf

[Bug ld/25591] Should /DISCARD/ : { *(.symtab) *(.strtab) } work?

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25591 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/25629] objcopy : SIGSEGV in filter_symbols ( objcopy.c:1584 )

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25629 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #16 from Kaylee --- Created attachment 12348 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12348&action=edit patch to add test for -z nosectionheader This patch adds the test for it, based against your branch. -- You a

[Bug binutils/25632] New: #error config.h must be #included before system headers

2020-03-04 Thread hftsai256 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25632 Bug ID: 25632 Summary: #error config.h must be #included before system headers Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ld/25630] BFD assertion failure at elf32-xtensa.c:3288 in elf_xtensa_finish_dynamic_sections

2020-03-04 Thread jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25630 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://autobuild.buildroo

[Bug ld/25630] New: BFD assertion failure at elf32-xtensa.c:3288 in elf_xtensa_finish_dynamic_sections

2020-03-04 Thread jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25630 Bug ID: 25630 Summary: BFD assertion failure at elf32-xtensa.c:3288 in elf_xtensa_finish_dynamic_sections Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: NEW

[Bug ld/25630] BFD assertion failure at elf32-xtensa.c:3288 in elf_xtensa_finish_dynamic_sections

2020-03-04 Thread jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25630 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||xtensa-linux-uclibc --

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug ld/25570] [ld] Duplicate "warning: changing start of section"

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25570 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --

[Bug ld/25570] [ld] Duplicate "warning: changing start of section"

2020-03-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25570 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=baf09cba8f97be8044f7422cb31b1cb3f23e2762 commit baf09cba8f97be8044f7422cb31b1

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #14 from Kaylee --- The information on the number of symbols in the symbol table is available in DT_HASH->nchain, as the chain table parallels the symbol table. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > libbar.so is OK for ld.so. But there is no sufficient info for ld to tell > how many entries in SYMTAB. ld.so wants to know if a shared library has a definition of

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #10) > Created attachment 12343 [details] > patch to add flag to not emit the section header table to the BFD-based ld > > I'll add a testcase shortly. Thanks. I put your pat

[Bug binutils/25629] New: objcopy : SIGSEGV in filter_symbols ( objcopy.c:1584 )

2020-03-04 Thread fdgkhdkgh at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25629 Bug ID: 25629 Summary: objcopy : SIGSEGV in filter_symbols ( objcopy.c:1584 ) Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug ld/25570] [ld] Duplicate "warning: changing start of section"

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25570 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 12344 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12344&action=edit not so awful fix Maybe it's not so hard to fix. I'll test this one overnight -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug ld/21464] relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 on OpenRISC, when linking libQtGui.so.4.8.7

2020-03-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21464 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #10 from Kaylee --- Created attachment 12343 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12343&action=edit patch to add flag to not emit the section header table to the BFD-based ld I'll add a testcase shortly. -- Yo

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

2020-03-04 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #9 from Kaylee --- Created attachment 12342 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12342&action=edit patch to add BFD support for not emitting the section header table -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug ld/25570] [ld] Duplicate "warning: changing start of section"

2020-03-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25570 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---