https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27344
Bug ID: 27344
Summary: The --gdb-index linker flag is not documented
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27311
--- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7d409ac001cce916661d345bff01ed589991e762
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27311
--- Comment #16 from Alan Modra ---
Huh, this time it's the scan over dependent libraries after LTO recompilation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27311
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27215
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27309
Dmitry V. Levin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glebfm at altlinux dot org,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #4)
> Works for me with GCC 11 (1/31/21 snapshot).
>
> Please also throw in a -v option on your gcc command and attach the verbose
> output. I'd like to see
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13201
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13201=edit
initpri3a.readelf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13200
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13200=edit
initpri3.o.readelf
initpri3.o.readelf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #2)
> I haven't yet managed to get a clean build of GCC 11 to try to reproduce,
> but I do have a suspicion. Gold reverses the .ctors entries in .init_array,
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26913
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27314
--- Comment #5 from Petr Ovtchenkov ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
You arguments prevailed. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant ---
Works for me with GCC 11 (1/31/21 snapshot).
Please also throw in a -v option on your gcc command and attach the verbose
output. I'd like to see what options your compiler is passing to the linker.
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27311
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27314
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Petr Ovtchenkov from comment #2)
>
> You test give nothing: as you see, in case of absent .note.gnu.property
> section problem disappear (no overlapping section, no problems).
Check again.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #2)
> I haven't yet managed to get a clean build of GCC 11 to try to reproduce,
If GCC 11 generates DWARF5 debug info, some gold tests may fail.
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 13198
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13198=edit
implement
If comment 7 is correct then this fairly trivial patch should implement it.
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27309
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liska ---
I've created a pull request and it seems that it would require a work:
https://github.com/strace/strace/pull/171
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27270
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945
Bug 26945 depends on bug 27270, which changed state.
Bug 27270 Summary: ar segfaults trying to build virtualbox guest additions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27270
What|Removed |Added
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945
Bug 26945 depends on bug 27284, which changed state.
Bug 27284 Summary: ar: wrong permissions on output file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27284
What|Removed |Added
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27284
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27270
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6184480d7ce1bcd57669a62867efc68418d0de7c
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945
--- Comment #19 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6184480d7ce1bcd57669a62867efc68418d0de7c
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27284
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6184480d7ce1bcd57669a62867efc68418d0de7c
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27284
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
How exactly is the proposed SHF_LINK_ORDER trick supposed to work? A reference
to start_foo/stop_foo symbols from a kept section currently marks all input
sections named foo as kept. Are you suggesting
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27311
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27311
--- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d2ea9f3a70a2d44cae20ab43609a71f1e616b43a
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27311
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f01fb44c0621b064996493bb5acd5077646ea84e
commit
33 matches
Mail list logo
