--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-08 01:43
---
Fixed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-08 03:03
---
No 2.18 or 2.19 updates are planned for FSF binutils, and as HJ says, this is
really a gcc bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-11 09:31
---
Should now be fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-11 09:55
---
Fixed, thanks!
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 02:05
---
Fixed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 02:50
---
Likely a filesystem bug
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 03:04
---
Not a bug. If you care enough I guess you'll add the testcases yourself. ;-)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 03:14
---
You can easily add m4 processing to gas yourself by writing a tiny wrapper
script. I see no need to add yet another feature to gas.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 03:24
---
*** Bug 10714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 03:24
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10109 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 13:47
---
As I said I could not reproduce this bug with many different versions of FSF
binutils. Have you built a version of FSF binutils that exhibits this bug? If
so, I'd like to know which version and the arguments you
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 00:51
---
Fixed mainline and 2.20
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 00:59
---
Have you managed to build one of the more recent snapshots to test whether this
bug is fixed?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 02:46
---
In that case, I'm going to assume that the patch I applied 2009-09-18 fixed the
problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 03:09
---
I wonder why .ncdata has size zero in your map? I would have expected
.ncdata 0x11e96ed80x8 load address 0x01e96ed8
0x11e96ee0. = ALIGN (0x10)
*fill
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 04:33
---
Created an attachment (id=4510)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4510action=view)
possible fix
I reckon this could be the same problem as one I fixed for ppc64 in
http://sourceware.org/ml
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 04:35
---
Please try out the fix against your sources. I don't have arm compilers readily
available to test this out myself
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 05:24
---
Appears to be fixed in 2.20
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 05:27
---
I wonder if this bug might be fixed by the patch I attached to
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10259
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 06:24
---
Is this problem present in current binutils? There have been fixes to the A8
erratum handling code since your report. Also, you might like to see whether my
proposed fix for http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 11:31
---
closing due to lack of response
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 02:52
---
Crazy C++ templated code take a crazy amount of time to compile/link on my
memory starved machine. This is hardly a ld bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 09:37
---
The sysv gabi says:
When the link editor combines several relocatable object files, it does not
allow multiple definitions of STB_GLOBAL symbols with the same name. On the
other hand, if a defined global symbol
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 12:39
---
Hmm, OK my guess about memory seems wrong. Please compress and attach the .s
file. If you can't do this because even the compressed file is too large,
please try binutils-2.20. 2.18 is quite old, and whatever
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 13:55
---
HJ, I don't understand your point in comment #3.
If your 9679 testcase isn't valid C then you had no reason to apply your 9679
patch. If your 9679 testcase is valid (and I think it is), then I believe the
link
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 14:05
---
In reply to comment #6. Look again.
$ nm -o *.o | grep _ZN13LnkPropertiesD1Ev
fileselector.o: U _ZN13LnkPropertiesD1Ev
lnkproperties.o:0ae9 T _ZN13LnkPropertiesD1Ev
moc_lnkproperties.o:0001 W
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 14:59
---
$ grep '\.section' main2.s | sort | uniq | wc -l
48940
So, we have a large number of sections. COFF uses a 16 bit field in the file
symbol structure to store section numbers. BFD code in various places tests
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-18 07:26
---
Fixed. You'll now get an error from the assembler.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: amodra at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: amodra at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-27 02:48
---
That last comment isn't true. You can have section VMAs such that the VMA
doesn't correspond to phdr p_vaddr plus the section offset within the phdr, for
example, when the phdr segment is packed with overlays
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-27 12:22
---
Oops, that isn't right about ppc64 @got relocs. They can and do go into
multiple TOC groups. The error was that the GOT entry offset calculation was
assuming the first TOC group.
--
http://sourceware.org
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-02-01 22:27
---
It wouldn't be correct to warn in the generic parts of the linker, and difficult
to correct the printed map value. The right place for a warning is somewhere in
the ELF backend, perhaps
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-02-22 12:10
---
.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 14:29
---
Patch reverted, reopening.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 02:32
---
I had good reason to make the change in lma default and I still think it is a
better default than the previous behaviour, although I may not have made the
change if I'd known that many people would be affected
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11339
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-04 00:15
---
Huh, there's lots of sloppy programming in dwarf2.c I'm testing a patch that
catches all alloc failures in that file.
--
What|Removed |Added
://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/dwarf2.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.130r2=1.131
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-04 04:03
---
Fixed I think. Please reopen if I've missed something.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-10 22:39
---
Applying. Also fixing the sizing loop that similarly used the wrong struct.
--
What|Removed |Added
Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 01:47
---
Thanks!
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
with the wrong toc pointer.
--
Summary: segfault in call_gmon_start
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: amodra at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: amodra at gmail
/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.4950r2=1.4951
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.319r2=1.320
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-12 22:41
---
Fixed mainline. Should go on the branch if we make another release
.
--
Summary: bugs on exit from large powerpc64 binary
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: amodra at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: amodra at gmail dot com
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-14 06:38:45
date|
From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-14 07:16
---
Patch applied
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-17 07:26
---
Fixed on mainline http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-01/msg00336.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11383
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-17 10:41
---
Fixed mainline with
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-03/msg00084.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11382
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-25 04:06
---
Proposed patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-03/msg00373.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11426
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
=1.164r2=1.165
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-04-10 14:13
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-05-08 22:31
---
Silly error in using abfd-sections.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 10:25
---
Created an attachment (id=4790)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4790action=view)
Alternate patch to avoid the abort
Nick, I prefer to leave in the abort to catch other cases we may not have
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 10:22
---
No, what you're trying to do is not supported, and I think it would not be easy
to implement.
--
What|Removed |Added
/ldexp.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.81r2=1.82
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-05-14 03:32
---
Internal error fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-05-14 03:54
---
Take a look at vmas shown by objdump -h. They are different to those shown by
your program. Find out why by looking at the source to objdump.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|amodra at gmail dot com |unassigned at sources dot
||redhat dot com
Status
/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/configure.host.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.47r2=1.48
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-05-14 07:39
---
.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-05-29 05:29
---
As requested
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-06-19 07:23
---
Patch is OK, please apply.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11728
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
=srcr1=1.137r2=1.138
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-06-21 08:01
---
Fixed mainline
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
=1.52r2=1.53
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-07-23 07:10
---
.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-07-28 02:34
---
There is no problem with the MAX operator as far as I can tell. Your source of
confusion is twofold.
1) A constant like 0x1000 inside an ouput section statement is not an absolute
constant, but rather a section
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|relative constant confusion |ld scripts relative constant
||confusion
Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-07-28 08:45
---
.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-02 02:47
---
This is a generic problem that will affect all targets built with a 32-bit
bfd_vma. It is a bug in bignum handling.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-02 02:58
---
Looks like a strip bug rather than a gold bug to me. Reclassifying.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-02 04:09
---
Perhaps I was a little hasty in saying this is a strip bug. When looking at
good.so more carefully, I see some really weird segment values.
This one:
LOAD 0x01bce8 0x0001bce8
amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-02 13:21
---
.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|binutils
=1.337
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-06 01:52
---
Fixed mainline
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-28 10:47
---
What toolchain produced DivaP? I'm asking because the headers are not
consistent. If you look at section header offsets and program header offsets,
you'll see that .note.ABI-tag is part of the first PT_LOAD
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-28 13:43
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Can you at least tell me the vendor?
Why does strip from binutils-2.20.51.0.8 work? Because it has a different set
of bugs to the latest binutils. Sometimes a fix for one bug is wrong
/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.5120r2=1.5121
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.517r2=1.518
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-30 06:07
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-09 02:06
---
Nick, I think you're just papering over the real problem here. Our handling of
assignments inside ONLY_IF... sections is quite broken. To see more problems,
try the link with a map file. :-(
The trouble
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-09 13:01
---
Created an attachment (id=4973)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4973action=view)
proposed fix
Also late in the day so possibly suspect. Running tests overnight.
--
What
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/bad-section-flag.s.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/elf.exp.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.65r2=1.66
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-17 00
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-17 11:41
---
Fixed mainline 2010-07-20 Mike Frysinger
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-19 03:51
---
*** Bug 12039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12038
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-20 04:21
---
This is really a bug in FreeEMS. The linker scripts don't mention where to place
.ppageF8 input sections. (The .ppageF8 output section doesn't have
*(.ppageF8).) So placement of objects/utils.o .ppageF8 is left
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-25 08:05
---
If anything, it's a bug that 32-bit gas accepts this expression. The gas
operator does an unsigned shift right, so the result of -0xef60 16 is indeed
the value printed in the error message
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at gmail dot com
|redhat dot com |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-09-29 12:08:39
date|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12110
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12030
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12110
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12226
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11742
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||JFTrudeau at cvty
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12226
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12235
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2606
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot
1 - 100 of 3675 matches
Mail list logo
