--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-02-22 21:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=419)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=419&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] common2]$ make LD=ld
gcc -O -g -c main.c
gcc -O -g -fPIC -c foo.c
ld -sh
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=757
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-02-22 23:52 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-02/msg00011.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-02-28 17:27 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-02/msg00521.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-02 18:35 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-02 18:33 ---
Really fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-22 17:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=441)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=441&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] empty-4]$ make
as -o foo.o foo.s
./ld -shared -o normal.so -T normal.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-25 00:37 ---
Jim, is the proposed patch OK?
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-25 02:22 ---
Can we modify the patch to have it a switch to turn it on/off and make it
on by default? Then, we can just turn it off in the existing testcases and
add a new one for this.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-25 17:18 ---
With the patch applied, I got
./build-ia64-linux/gas/testsuite/gas.log:FAIL: ia64 opc-b
./build-ia64-linux/gas/testsuite/gas.log:FAIL: ia64 opc-f
./build-ia64-linux/gas/testsuite/gas.log:FAIL: ia64 opc-i
./build-ia64
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-28 21:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=447)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=447&action=view)
A patch to tune for itanium1 and itanium2
This patch adds "-mtune=[itanium1|itanium2]". I
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-28 21:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=448)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=448&action=view)
An updated patch
This is an updated patch. I documented the change and modified
extra_g
ormal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: mips-linux
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=846
--- Yo
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-16 21:44 ---
It is very hard to read when the whole bug report is in one line.
Please re-file it.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl at lucon dot org
|redhat dot com |
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla
ils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzil
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=858
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-18 17:10 ---
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00452.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00453.html
have been checked in. Another patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00456.html
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-19 15:57 ---
If `y' is undefined, ".set x,y" only works correctly when `x' is global.
When 'x' is local, ".set x,y" can't work right.
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-19 17:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=460)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=460&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] set-3]$ make
cc -DGOOD -shared -fPIC -o libx.so s1.c s2.c
cc -o x m.c
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-20 17:27 ---
Fixed now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-22 15:15 ---
I need to figure out a way to pass tests in ld-discard, which expect normal
return from ld.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=858
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-22 20:07 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00638.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=858
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-25 19:31 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-27 17:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=467)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=467&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] version23]$ make CC=gcc
gcc-c -o main.o main.c
gcc -fPIC -c -o foo.
ponent: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=882
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the b
ormal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC t
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-27 23:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=468)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=468&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 299]$ make tar
tar cfz bug.tar.gz Makefile *.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 299]$
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-29 18:01 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00686.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-05 17:44 ---
Fixed with:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00822.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:03 ---
Please update binutils. 2.12.90.15 is way too old.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:46 ---
Please find out which DSO references __gcov_execvp and why.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:51 ---
Has it been fixed?
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=886
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:54 ---
Has this been fixed?
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=885
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:00 ---
Binutils 2.16 has been released. Nothing will be done for 2.15.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:19 ---
Are they related?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21070
We do need a testcase.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:06 ---
I closed after almost a year. Please reopen it with a small testcase if
it still fails.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:44 ---
Fixed with
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00273.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:13 ---
It is allowed by the ELF spec. Other compilers may generate such object
files on purpose. There is no need to warn.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:22 ---
No problem with the current binutils.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:55 ---
Please get kernel patches at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.4-seg-4.patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.6-seg-5.patch
--
What|Removed
sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: sh64-elf
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=936
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 18:01 ---
I opened a new bug 936.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 936 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 18:06 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00289.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 19:59 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00293.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 18:01 ---
*** Bug 857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=936
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 13:38 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 14:49 ---
The testcases expect local symbols in executable's symbol table. But they
aren't. I don't know much about mmix to say if it is correct or wrong.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 18:22 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 18:25 ---
Joern, does the patch work for you?
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
ponent: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug,
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 20:23 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00327.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 20:30 ---
Please make the binary available to me. I will take a look.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||schwab at suse dot de
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940
--- You are receiving this m
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 23:22 ---
I need your libpython2.4.so.1.0 and libomnithread.so.3.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-08 00:18 ---
There is a bug in libJTC.so which references an internal symbol,
__fini_array_end. When linker tried to report the user error,
it crashed. This patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00329.html
should
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-08 01:04 ---
That is your bug. You never want to do
-Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a
You should use
-Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939
--- You are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-08 13:45 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-08 13:44 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-09 14:46 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-09 14:51 ---
R_IA64_FPTR64LSB is needed for function pointer reference from a
dlopened DSO.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-09 14:47 ---
Jan, is this caused by your patch?
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-12 16:12 ---
A patch is postd at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00428.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=834
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-12 16:38 ---
Slot 0 has to be NOP only for BBB. Here is an update.
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00431.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=834
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-16 18:51 ---
I can't reproduce it with binutils in CVS nor the Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.3.
I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] empty-7]$ make
./ld -o x -T script.ld test-lma.o
./objdump -h x
x: file format elf32-i386
Sections:
Idx
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-16 17:57 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00453.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-17 17:06 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00325.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-17 17:20 ---
1. I didn't see a FILL statement in your linker script.
2. LMA of an ELF section is an artificial thing. You should use "readelf -lS"
to see the real segment/section/memory layout of an ELF binary.
3.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-27 13:50 ---
It is expected. See
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2003-10/msg00376.html
for possible solution.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-27 19:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=500)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=500&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pie-1]$ make
gcc -B./ -fPIC -c -o y.o y.c
gcc -B./ -pie -o y y.o
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 06:36 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00030.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 06:37 ---
I meant this one:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00069.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 14:18 ---
It has nothing to do with "ld -r". The problem is "nm -l" doesn't work well
on .o file:
# nm -l t1.o
T main /user/hjl/bugs/binutils/debug/t1.c:5
D test1_v1 /user/hjl/b
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 14:22 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00246.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 14:23 ---
An updated patch is at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00070.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 18:12 ---
Should be fixed now.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 19:09 ---
Cris uses
.data :
{
PROVIDE (__Sdata = .);
*(.data .data.* .gnu.linkonce.d.*)
KEEP (*(.gnu.linkonce.d.*personality*))
SORT(CONSTRUCTORS)
}
Even if .data is empty, .data is still
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 20:10 ---
The updated patch is at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00076.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-05 00:18 ---
"nm -l" doesn't work on this:
---t4.c---
__attribute ((section(".text.foo")))
int test2_f1(int val)
{
return val;
}
int test2_f2(int val)
{
return val;
}
After applying
http://s
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-05 18:39 ---
A proposal is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00082.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=990
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-05 22:33 ---
The updated patch is at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00089.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=990
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-06 14:56 ---
I checked in my patch. I will have a followup patch later.
nm and gdb may or may not share that piece of code. You need to file a gdb
bug report.
BTW, does entry.S have dwarf debug info? does gdb get wrong line
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-06 17:30 ---
If you have a testcase with "nm -l" on executable, I will fix nm. But
gdb needs to be fixed separately.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=990
--- You are receiving this ma
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=995
--- You are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-08 18:56 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00185.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=995
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-09 01:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=513)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=513&action=view)
A testcase
This test case shows the -l outputs before and after the patch in bug 806.
--
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,fnf at specifixinc dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-g
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-09 06:09 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00206.html
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1000
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-09 14:25 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-09 17:03 ---
The way I looked at
.text2 :
{
. = ALIGN(4096);
*(.text2)
}
it will align .text2 to 4096 byte. If .text2 doesn't exist, the
alignment shouldn't apply. Another one
.text2 :
{
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-09 16:40 ---
This bug came back with
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00197.html
The problem is that now assignment to "dot" will caus the section to be
kept.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-01 16:37 ---
It is fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00338.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-07 17:43 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-07 17:46 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-09-09 19:54 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-09/msg00118.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1321
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1321
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-09-09 19:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=658)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=658&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] strip-2]$ make
as -x -o x.o x.s
cp x.o y.o
/usr/bin/strip -g y.o
readelf -t
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-09-09 19:45 ---
>From the gABI:
SHF_LINK_ORDER
This flag adds special ordering requirements for link editors. The
requirements apply if the sh_link field of this section's header references
another section (the linked-to
1 - 100 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
