https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14289
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14289
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Yuanhui
BTW: Is it possible to use my real name instead of the nick name in the change
log message? My real name is Yuanhui Zhang. My nick name is Asmwarrior.
Done.
Cheers
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11983
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Tom,
On further reflection I think the patch as applied will
cause gdb crashes. Due to the historical oddity of how
the BFD's filename was handled, gdb chose to go its own
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16199
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16434
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16433
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: nickc at redhat dot com
Created attachment 7405
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7405action=edit
Files needed to reproduce problem
Linking together LTO
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7291|0 |1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7414|0 |1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7415|0 |1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16604
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16583
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16583
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16583
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7431|0 |1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16569
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16567
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16652
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16688
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16671
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16688
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Patch applied.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16694
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16694
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16761
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16744
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16744
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7519
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7519action=edit
Disable output if only -v or --verbose or --version is specified on the command
line
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16787
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16765
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16765
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7521
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7521action=edit
Applied gas patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16765
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Bug 13227 depends on bug 14698, which changed state.
Bug 14698 Summary: ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in
BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
What
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16787
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Corinna,
I have started looking into this bug, but I am a bit stumped. :-(
I guess that the problem is connected with the default manifest being
added
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Corinna,
After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok
with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC.
Excellent! :-)
I'm just wondering
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16787
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Ma,
Please could you upload the libc.a and libg.a files that you are using. I
have tried to find some on the net, but so far I have failed. :-(
Cheers
Nick
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16821
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16821
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16787
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7550
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7550action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16821
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Thanks Yuanhui - patch applied.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Angelo,
Hmm, the patch does work in my tests. My guess is either the patched linker
was not installed, or that it was installed but gcc was using the old linker
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7600
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7600action=edit
Proposed new patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #12 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Bernd,
Please try out the newly uploaded patch (in addition to the previous one).
Let me know how you get on.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7600|0 |1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Bernd,
Actually here is a better patch. The previous one also affected non-code
weak symbols which was the wrong thing to do.
Please try this patch out and let me know
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Bernd,
both variants of your patch do not affect x86_64, only 32-bit?
Yes. According to my test the x86_64 target is already working. (After the
first patch was applied
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16946
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16946
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16946
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
--- Comment #19 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7625
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7625action=edit
Additional patch - page align the .rsrc section
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16252
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
The testcase is missing a definition of the function pcap_offline_read().
If a dummy one is supplied then the test compiles and links without any
problems - except for a few
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16964
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7639
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7639action=edit
Built executable
I must be doing something wrong, because I am able to build
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16949
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16949
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16934
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16923
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16908
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16847
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16934
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Have you tried enabling link-time optimization in gcc. Ie compiling with -lfto
added to the g++ command lines. This appears to work for the test case you
supplied.
The problem I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6962
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Shweta
I am also getting the same error. You have given patch file. Can you please
help me where to place this file and fix this bug?
The patch file includes information about
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16949
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Sorry - I still cannot reproduce this problem, even with the object file and
library. :-( The external symbols that I am pulling in look the same as the
ones you use:
% readelf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
... and yet the testcase compiles and links without any problems:
% make
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -std=c99 -nostdinc -ffreestanding -g
-fno-stack-protector -c -o libc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17113
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17113
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi,
This sounds useful too and I will test it if this version is available on my
distribution. But what do you think of my idea?
Well it is certainly possible, and I can see how
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17110
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16563
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7405|0 |1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16563
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #21 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
I am sorry but this bug is just not reproducible with the FSF mainline binutils
sources. :-( I can only conclude that the bug must be something to do with
whatever patches
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17288
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17184
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17196
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17196
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7759
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7759action=edit
Modified test case that shows how to use a symbolic workaround
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17212
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17329
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Thomas,
Summary: it's the combination of an optimization flag (-O) with debugging
symbols (-g) that fails.
So, after all, maybe it's more a gcc issue than a binutils issue
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17323
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7792
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7792action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Mikhail,
Please try out this patch and let me know if it works
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17323
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17321
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17510
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17510
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17510
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
oops - sorry, I meant Michal not Markus. Sorry Michal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
1001 - 1100 of 3682 matches
Mail list logo