https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #6 from Felix von Leitner ---
-N makes .text and .data the same LOAD program header, which is
read+write+execute, so that is actually a real security problem.
It does make the binary smaller, but the cost is too high.
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #4 from Felix von Leitner ---
Hey Nick, thanks for the quick help!
With -z noseparate-code I'm down to 9512 bytes. That is much better but still
more than gold produces. And looking at the binary in a hex editor still shows
a ton
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: felix-glibc at fefe dot de
Target Milestone: ---
One of my projects is a small libc, for the express purpose of making small
static binaries. It comes with a small wrapper around
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: felix-glibc at fefe dot de
Target Milestone: ---
make[4]: Entering directory '/hdd/cvs/binutils-gdb/ld'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../bfd -I./../bfd -I./../include
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: felix-glibc at fefe dot de
Target Milestone: ---
I'm using gcc 8.2.0 with binutils 2.31.1 to build my dietlibc
(www.fefe.de/dietlibc/, use CVS version to reproduce).
Part of the startup code of my libc goes through auxvec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22782
Felix von Leitner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: felix-glibc at fefe dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 10782
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10782=edit
test case (object files and shell script that calls ld)
I wrote a small l
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: felix-glibc at fefe dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Problem 1:
/usr/bin/ld:
/hdd/home/leitner/projects/dietlibc-0.32/bin-x86_64/dietlibc.a(perror.o):
relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `sys_errlist' can not be used when
making a shared
at fefe dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11712
--- You are receiving this mail because
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: felix-glibc at fefe dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux
http
--- Additional Comments From felix-glibc at fefe dot de 2010-04-02 17:58
---
not that it matters, since the error message contains the line number of the
assert that triggers although it can happen in practice, but here you go:
binutils from cvs head as of yesterday, as I already
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: felix-glibc at fefe dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown
12 matches
Mail list logo
