[Bug binutils/2454] incorrect syntax in avr disassembly

2006-04-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-12 13:11 --- Thank you. I am now able to reproduce the bug and I have approved your patch. it does not quite perform as you say, since the hexadecimal form of the address is displayed twice: 0: 0e 94 7e 0e

[Bug binutils/2454] incorrect syntax in avr disassembly

2006-04-11 Thread hochstein at algo dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
--- Additional Comments From hochstein at algo dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2006-04-11 13:31 --- Here comes the test case: call __divmodhi4 .org 0x1cfc __divmodhi4: nop I compile the above program $ avr-as -I/usr/include/avr -mmcu=atmega32 -o

[Bug binutils/2454] incorrect syntax in avr disassembly

2006-04-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-07 14:48 --- Subject: Re: New: incorrect syntax in avr disassembly Hi hochstein, The disassembly for call and jmp looks like this: 43a: 0e 94 7e 0e call0x1cfc __divmodhi4 This causes problems since

[Bug binutils/2454] incorrect syntax in avr disassembly

2006-04-04 Thread hochstein at algo dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
--- Additional Comments From hochstein at algo dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2006-04-04 06:53 --- Why not strive for it if it can be done easily? I use avrora (http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/avrora/) to simulate the AVR program before writing it onto the real device. This

[Bug binutils/2454] incorrect syntax in avr disassembly

2006-04-03 Thread bje at sources dot redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04 01:54 --- This patch suggests that you are trying to make the disassembler's output suitable for input back into the assembler, correct? This is not normally something that the disassembler strives for. What are