[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d195b95c91febcdad3ec002d415586cee7f6cb16 commit d195b95c91febcdad3ec002d415586cee7f6cb16 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Oct 31 17:02:17 2022 -0700 binutils: Run PR binutils/26160 test Update expected PR binutils/26160 test output for readelf out change and run PR binutils/26160 test. PR binutils/26160 * testsuite/binutils-all/pr26160.r: Updated. * testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp: Run PR binutils/26160 test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d0dded5bc251e506ef65b13696c624ea8669ed6e commit d0dded5bc251e506ef65b13696c624ea8669ed6e Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Jun 23 09:19:05 2020 -0700 Add a testcase for PR binutils/26160 PR binutils/26160 * testsuite/binutils-all/pr26160.dwp.bz2: New file. * testsuite/binutils-all/pr26160.r: Likewise. * testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp: Run PR binutils/26160 test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=39f381cb80463bd814da549a927bee4643d4ceac commit 39f381cb80463bd814da549a927bee4643d4ceac Author: Nick Clifton Date: Tue Jun 23 16:06:38 2020 +0100 Fix decoding of indexed DWARF strings using pre-DWARF-5 string offset sections. Fix display of .debug_str_offsets.dwo sections. PR 26160 * dwarf.c (fetch_indexed_string): Detect and handle old style .debug_str_offset tables. (display_debug_str_offsets): Likewise. Also add support for .debug_str_offsets.dwo sections. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Right - this should now be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. Sorry about that - this is due to my patch to add support for the DW_MACRO_define_strx operand, which is not handling .debug_str_offsets.dwo sections correctly. I have a local patch which I am testing at this moment. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
