[Bug ld/23350] multiple prevailing defs for unused variable in lto mode

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23350 --- Comment #4 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net --- What difference does it make? This is undefined behavior. It doesn't link -fno-lto either. gcc -c main.i && gcc -c lib.i && ar rusc lib.a lib.o gcc main.o lib.a lib.a

[Bug ld/23350] multiple prevailing defs for unused variable in lto mode

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23350 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---

[Bug ld/22762] missing static variable constructor calls

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22762 Martin Storsjö changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin at martin dot st --- Comment

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu,

[Bug ld/23388] New: [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 Bug ID: 23388 Summary: [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386 Product: binutils Version: 2.31 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_31-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fa1b3193c52c319469f688b863d90274d3db4ccf commit

[Bug binutils/23389] New: Have objdump and addr2line retrieve symbols from separate debuginfo files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389 Bug ID: 23389 Summary: Have objdump and addr2line retrieve symbols from separate debuginfo files Product: binutils Version: 2.32 (HEAD) Status: NEW

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.31 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- I am

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- I can't reproduce it. With glibc 2.28, I got [hjl@gnu-skx-1 tools-build]$ du -sh glibc/release glibc-x32/release glibc-32bit/release 141Mglibc/release 120Mglibc-x32/release 114Mglibc-32bit/release

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose --- on x86_64-linux-gnu: $ ls -l /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1808440 Jul 7 16:34 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so on i686-linux-gnu (x86_64-linux-gnu multilib) $ ls -l

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=872899f1efeda1e93ed569d322c6b2ee85ce885c commit

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- I'm wondering why this is only seen for the non-default multilibs on i686-linux-gnu. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/23372] Empty GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_NEEDED/GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_USED aren't removed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23372 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|2.32 (HEAD)

[Bug binutils/23389] Have objdump and addr2line retrieve symbols from separate debuginfo files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug ld/23372] Empty GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_NEEDED/GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_USED aren't removed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23372 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_31-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f6becb01a7532bc0263ad9e0c9e59975c38db269 commit

[Bug ld/23350] multiple prevailing defs for unused variable in lto mode

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23350 Martin Liska changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You

[Bug ld/23388] [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib libraries on i386

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/23389] Have objdump and addr2line retrieve symbols from separate debuginfo files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > > How are separate debuginfo files are encoded in the executable? > > Ah - there are three different ways > > 1. In a

[Bug binutils/23389] Have objdump and addr2line retrieve symbols from separate debuginfo files

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > How are separate debuginfo files are encoded in the executable? Ah - there are three different ways 1. In a .gnu.debuglink section 2. In a