[Bug ld/23428] ld does not put program headers in a code-only load segment

2018-08-11 Thread evangelos at foutrelis dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428 --- Comment #16 from Evangelos Foutras --- The test case from comment #14 is still reproducible for me with both binutils master (1dc9e2d6) and binutils-2_31-branch (6ee91b1e). No change at all in the resulting binary, compared to just the

[Bug ld/23428] ld does not put program headers in a code-only load segment

2018-08-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428 --- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #16) > The test case from comment #14 is still reproducible for me with both > binutils master (1dc9e2d6) and binutils-2_31-branch (6ee91b1e). No change at > all in

[Bug ld/23428] ld does not put program headers in a code-only load segment

2018-08-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428 --- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ab9e342807d132182892de1be1a92d6e91a5c1da commit

[Bug ld/23428] ld does not put program headers in a code-only load segment

2018-08-11 Thread evangelos at foutrelis dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428 --- Comment #19 from Evangelos Foutras --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #18) > (In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #16) > > The test case from comment #14 is still reproducible for me with both > > binutils master (1dc9e2d6) and

[Bug ld/23515] New: Empty GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND isn't removed

2018-08-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23515 Bug ID: 23515 Summary: Empty GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND isn't removed Product: binutils Version: 2.32 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2