[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives

2020-02-14 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/25551] R_X86_64_PLT32 referencing .L should not emit an outstanding relocation

2020-02-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25551 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|unspecified

[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives

2020-02-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #1) > However, as pointed out in the mail discussion already, consistent behavior > should result (which currently isn't the case): > > 1. Since .arch generally enables pre

[Bug gas/25438] x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

2020-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0e6724dee4984e62e2f8e7da431f3b875ab14c4a commit 0e6724dee4984e62e2f8e7da431f3b8

[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives

2020-02-14 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #1) > > However, as pointed out in the mail discussion already, consistent behavior > > should result (which currently isn't the

[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives

2020-02-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #1) > > > However, as pointed out in the mail discussion already, consistent > > > beh

[Bug gas/25531] [Z80][PATCH] Fix SDCC support

2020-02-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25531 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives

2020-02-14 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550 --- Comment #5 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > > > Is SSE2 a prerequisite for AVX? > > > > This can be viewed either way, I gue

[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives

2020-02-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3) > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > > > > Is SSE2 a prerequisite for AVX?

Issue 19915 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Integer-overflow in print_insn_wasm32

2020-02-14 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 19915 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Integer-overflow in print_insn_wasm32 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19915#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your f

Issue 20077 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in unpack_instr

2020-02-14 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 20077 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in unpack_instr https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20077#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendl

Issue 20094 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Timeout in fuzz_bfd

2020-02-14 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #2 on issue 20094 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Timeout in fuzz_bfd https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20094#c2 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You

Issue 20050 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Stack-buffer-overflow in buffer_read_memory

2020-02-14 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 20050 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Stack-buffer-overflow in buffer_read_memory https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20050#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. -

Issue 20058 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Crash in _bfd_hexdump

2020-02-14 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 20058 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Crash in _bfd_hexdump https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20058#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot --