[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a05e3e203954fac0aacfcb647b1f8b52760e6df0 commit

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e67e940f5d9102fb452b87aca441a2829a67d66b commit

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- gas/config/tc-crx.c:1269:38: error: implicit conversion from ‘copreg’ to ‘reg’ [-Werror=enum-conversion] 1269 | CRX_PRINT (0, getreg_image (arg->cr), shift); -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- gas/config/tc-crx.c:50:63: note: in definition of macro ‘CRX_PRINT’ 50 | #define CRX_PRINT(BYTE, NUM, SHIFT) output_opcode[BYTE] |= (NUM << SHIFT) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=70b1b570bfba0c97b37870747eb4bc0ae665cf66 commit

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8bbc5da5ee827bd9c962d238777e20db2c100598 commit

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c4612b92e38e9495970afc703f222f99d27c1b4d commit

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- gas/config/tc-xgate.c:1339:5: error: implicit conversion from ‘enum elf_xgate_reloc_type’ to ‘bfd_reloc_code_real_type’ {aka ‘enum bfd_reloc_code_real’} [-Werror=enum-conversion] 1339 | R_XGATE_PCREL_9);

[Bug gas/26044] New: Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 Bug ID: 26044 Summary: Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10 Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- gas/config/tc-crx.c:434:17: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] 434 | *++opcode = 0x31; | ~~^~ -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- gas/config/tc-v850.c:1750:17: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] 1750 | buffer[1] = 0x07; | ~~^~ -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- gas/config/tc-vax.c:452:13: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] 452 |p[1] = VAX_BRB; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- gas/config/tc-visium.c:497:7: error: writing 4 bytes into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] 497 | memcpy (buf + 4, buf, 4); | ^~~~ -- You are receiving

[Bug gold/15646] gold-generated .gdb_index has duplicated symbols that gdb-generated index doesn't

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15646 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=40d22035a7fc239ac1e944b75a2e3ee9029d1b76 commit

[Bug gas/26040] [2.34 regression] binutils fails to build a cross-GCC 10.1 targeting aarch64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26040 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #14 from Alan Modra --- All of the "Replace fragP->fr_literal with >fr_literal[0]" patches are just silencing a gcc bug. Have you opened a gcc bug? (Some future version of gcc might see through the obfuscation of the source,

[Bug gas/24352] Incorrect EVEX optimization

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24352 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.33 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ld/26048] New: -gsplit-dwarf leads to invalid PE file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26048 Bug ID: 26048 Summary: -gsplit-dwarf leads to invalid PE file Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

Issue 21849 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Direct-leak in xmalloc

Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 21849 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Direct-leak in xmalloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=21849#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot

Issue 21180 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_cxxfilt: Timeout in fuzz_cxxfilt

Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #5 on issue 21180 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_cxxfilt: Timeout in fuzz_cxxfilt https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=21180#c5 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly

Issue 21211 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_cxxfilt: Integer-overflow in d_compact_number

Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 21211 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_cxxfilt: Integer-overflow in d_compact_number https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=21211#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e3fed0f2fe98c52dc8cb160be2a30e973b1dca3f commit

[Bug ld/26047] New: Don't allow linking ET_EXEC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26047 Bug ID: 26047 Summary: Don't allow linking ET_EXEC Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- Also commit a39d29cda15d4f303c989eb0ac644a3144827881 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon May 25 04:50:56 2020 -0700 gas: Update fr_literal access in frag for GCC 10 commit

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #15 from Alan Modra --- BTW, that last comment wasn't meant to indicate I disagree with the patches to work around these warnings. I'm happy with the binutils patches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug gas/26044] Some targets can't be compiled with GCC 10

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26044 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #14) > All of the "Replace fragP->fr_literal with >fr_literal[0]" patches > are just silencing a gcc bug. Have you opened a gcc bug? (Some future > version of gcc might