https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #42 from cqwrteur ---
*** Bug 30375 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #10 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14895
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14895=edit
ld no link
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #12 from cqwrteur ---
Ida pro result for GNU ld. I do not see jmp instruction here.
.text:000140001540 ; === S U B R
O U T I N E ===
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #13 from cqwrteur ---
.text:000140001588 ; === S U B R
O U T I N E ===
.text:000140001588
.text:000140001588 ;
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #8 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14893
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14893=edit
lld has link from text section that jmps here while ld does not
lld has link from text section that jmps here while
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14894
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14894=edit
ld no link
ld no link 1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #11 from cqwrteur ---
Here is the disassembly result from IDA pro.
.text:000140001540 ; === S U B R
O U T I N E ===
.text:000140001540
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #14 from cqwrteur ---
Some one tries this program:
#include
#include
#include
#include
typedef void* (__cdecl* fn_type_t)(void* self, char const* string);
int main()
{
MessageBoxA(nullptr,"pause",nullptr,0);
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #15 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14896
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14896=edit
He found that ld binds std::cout to the address of std::cout in the dll
Why is this .refptr?? It should be just
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #7 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14892
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14892=edit
executable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14891
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14891=edit
ld missing import of ios_base_library_init
I use lld and it imports one more symbol than ld.
I guess it is the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #16 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14897
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14897=edit
Someone has found the problem here
Someone has found the problem here.
std::cout does not bind correctly for ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #17 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14898
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14898=edit
English translation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 59148 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_addr2line:
Heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl32
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=59148#c3
This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
Bug ID: 30479
Summary: bfd.info build failure on centos 8
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #2 from nightstrike ---
Renaming the included texinfo directory to test configure's ability to build
texinfo shows that that doesn't even work anymore:
/bin/sh: line 7:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.40
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30481
Bug ID: 30481
Summary: bfd version inconsistencies
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike ---
It looks like adding texinfo to top level to be built automatically (like isl,
gmp, mpfr, mpc, dejagnu, and a bunch of other stuff) doesn't work OOTB, because
the binutils tarball include a texinfo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30481
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #3 from nightstrike ---
Ok, I worked around it for now by touching bfd/doc/bfd.info and gas/doc/as.info
(which also exhibited the problem) in the source dir. I had to do this
individually, and before each rebuild. I think the
25 matches
Mail list logo
