[Bug gold/13887] New: Very slow linking when -Map is used

2012-03-21 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com CC: ccout...@google.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 6296 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6296 callgrind output Ian As requested a profile output of gold

[Bug gold/13887] Very slow linking when -Map is used

2012-03-21 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13887 Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.sm

[Bug binutils/13925] New: objdump -g segfaults in stab_demangle_v3_arg for C++ files.

2012-03-28 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com Classification: Unclassified This bug got introduced somewhere between 2.20 and 2.21. I verified that 2.20 works OK with that same file. GCC 4.6.3 was used

[Bug binutils/13925] objdump -g segfaults in stab_demangle_v3_arg for C++ files.

2012-03-28 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925 Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.sm

[Bug binutils/13925] objdump -g segfaults in stab_demangle_v3_arg for C++ files.

2012-03-29 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925 --- Comment #2 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-03-29 09:31:14 UTC --- Attachments are larger then 1000kb Object file : http://www.4shared.com/zip/-v8iMum2/filegcc34.html Source file (might not compile with newer GCC versions

[Bug binutils/13925] objdump -g segfaults in stab_demangle_v3_arg for C++ files.

2012-03-30 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925 --- Comment #5 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-03-30 11:18:24 UTC --- Hi Nick The patch you uploaded is for another PR. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug binutils/13925] objdump -g segfaults in stab_demangle_v3_arg for C++ files.

2012-03-30 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925 Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/14779] readelf.c:403:3: error: unknown type name 'mbstate_t'

2013-04-18 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14779 Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.sm

[Bug ld/15382] ld segfaults with .debug_types sections

2013-04-19 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15382 Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips64

[Bug ld/15382] ld segfaults with .debug_types sections

2013-04-22 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15382 --- Comment #3 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2013-04-22 15:43:54 UTC --- Thanks for the patch. I currently running some new builds with the patch. Is this the same bug that triggered the assertions in 2.22 ? In 2.22 the bfd

[Bug gold/15861] New: internal error in set_info_section, at output.h:3039 when using linker script

2013-08-20 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com CC: ccoutant at google dot com ld.gold -T ../make/link_script_46_x86_64_rel -X -N -r --fatal-warnings -o ../lib/something.a ../objs/file.o

[Bug gold/13887] Very slow linking when -Map is used

2013-08-20 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13887 --- Comment #1 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com --- Last reconfirmed with 2.23.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list

[Bug gold/13887] Very slow linking when -Map is used

2013-08-20 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13887 --- Comment #2 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com --- Now that I'm looking at this again, these are some rough numbers: GOLD + Map = real0m35.770s GOLD + NO Map = real0m1.862s BFD + Map = real0m3.128s BFD + NO Map = real

[Bug gold/15864] New: incremental linking: segfault i386::first_plt_entry_offset

2013-08-20 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com CC: ccoutant at google dot com (gdb) run --incremental --wrap _printf --wrap _fdprintf --wrap _vprintf --wrap _vfdprintf -X -N -e _sysInit -Ttext 0x0012a000

[Bug ld/19152] --gc-sections changes scope from global to local for --defysm or PROVIDE()

2015-10-19 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19152 --- Comment #2 from Jan Smets <jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com> --- fixed where, what patch/changelog ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-bi

[Bug ld/19152] New: --gc-sections changes scope from global to local for --defysm or PROVIDE()

2015-10-19 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com Target Milestone: --- $ cat test.s .extern _start_ramcode .text .global init init: call _start_ramcode $ gcc -c test.s -o test.o $ ld

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-28 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 Jan Smets <jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips-wrs-vxworks|mi

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-28 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 --- Comment #6 from Jan Smets <jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com> --- What would be the easiets way to reproduce a testcase. (without sending proprietary data - are there any tools to discard all data from object files or something?) -

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-27 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 Jan Smets <jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mi

[Bug ld/19739] New: ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-27 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com Target Milestone: --- ld.bfd -r on mips When compiling object files with dwarf debug info the link time goes up significantly. I suspect this is due to the large amount of sections. I needed to reduce

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-03-01 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 --- Comment #12 from Jan Smets <jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com> --- Patch works, also on mips. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-bi