https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23595
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Proposed patch, lightly tested without regressions in the binutils, gas, ld
testsuites for msp430-elf/-mlarge and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
diff --git a/bfd/elf.c b/bfd/elf.c
index b8860c4..14612bd 100644
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 11217
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11217&action=e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23595
--- Comment #5 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.or
tatus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When building GCC trunk in a unified source tree with binutils, the bui
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The binutils-gdb master branch is failing to build since:
commit 1ff6de031241c59d0ff9fa01d3c0a4049b0e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25064
--- Comment #2 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> You are somehow using an old version of a generated file, ld/ldlex.c. This
> should be generated from ldlex.l if you have flex/bison installed, a
> requireme
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The Binutils "simple objcopy of executable" test is failing for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25662
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 12368
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12368&action=edit
patch
The attached patch fixes the issue, although I haven't been able to totally
convince myself of
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25662
--- Comment #3 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 12370
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12370&action=edit
original executable
Attached the original executable file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25662
--- Comment #5 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #4)
> Created attachment 12403 [details]
> Alternate patch
>
> This also fixes the testcase. I'm inclined to go this way since it's really
> the lack of sh_offset
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25662
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 12404
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12404&action=edit
testcase
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #7)
> Updated patch applied. Jozef, perhaps you could
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25662
--- Comment #10 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9)
> The testcase patch looks mostly good, thanks. At first I thought you had
> the remote host file names wrong, but it doesn't seem too important what
> file n
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When assembling an SHF_GNU_MBIND section for arm-unknown-elf,
gas/config/obj-elf.c:obj_elf_section will set
elf_backend_data->elf_osabi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26722
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-unknown-elf
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 12972
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12972&action=edit
bss_lma_adjust.ld
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 12971
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12971&acti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
--- Comment #3 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> It's not just the objcopy going wrong here. ld shouldn't be creating two
> PT_LOAD headers where one would suffice.
Is it intended that empty .bss sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
--- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 13010
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13010&action=edit
pr26907-2.ld
Thanks.
However, I'm getting a similar issue with the attached linker script - an empty
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
--- Comment #7 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 13011
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13011&action=edit
pr26907-2.out
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 13012
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13012&action=edit
pr26907-2.s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
--- Comment #10 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9)
> Yes, if you play games with lma and vma you can easily create layouts that
> _bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments won't handle very well. A section that
> has
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907
--- Comment #11 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #10)
> (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9)
> > I'm not interested in trying to make every weird user script produce the
> > minimum number of load head
24 matches
Mail list logo
