[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2022-07-29 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-06-01 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Marco, >> I doubt if this is the same as oprofile will produce, but both tools >> will be displaying processed DWARF line number information so they >> should be roughly equivalent. > > The objdump output looks fine. Does that mean the issue has to be in Oprofile? Not "has to", but it is

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-05-01 Thread Marco.Leise at gmx dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 --- Comment #7 from Marco Leise --- I am actually using a git checkout past 2.30 right now and the issue is still present. What is the command line you use for objdump? I.e. is there a way to make it print source lines for symbols as oprofile

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-04-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Marco Leise from comment #5) Hi Marco, > Hope that helps! Sorry - I have not been able to get anywhere with this. :-( Are you able to test the newer release of the binutils (2.30) to see if

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-04-12 Thread Marco.Leise at gmx dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 --- Comment #5 from Marco Leise --- I use this for callgraphs: operf --vmlinux /usr/src/linux/vmlinux --callgraph ./app_to_be_profiled opreport -c%g -t=0.1% -p=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/,/lib/modules/`uname -r`/video/ And this for

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-04-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Marco, > I have a similar Gentoo setup with binutils 2.29.1 and see the same errors. This is surprising. > The instructions seem outdated, as neither binutils nor gdb currently offer > the "zlib"

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-04-10 Thread Marco.Leise at gmx dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 --- Comment #3 from Marco Leise --- Created attachment 10938 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10938=edit Compressed glibc amd64 debug information from a Gentoo system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-04-10 Thread Marco.Leise at gmx dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 Marco Leise changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Marco.Leise at gmx dot de --- Comment

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information

2015-07-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING