[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-08-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-08-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- Extra patch applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-08-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=334d4ced42d3d54a70a19f1323ff41c5a5f4ff5e commit

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-08-23 Thread manisandro at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mani --- Hi Nick, thanks, fixes the segfault. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-08-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 11199 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11199=edit Proposed patch Hi Sandro, Please could you see if the uploaded patch fixes the problem ? Thanks. Cheers

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-08-08 Thread manisandro at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manisandro at gmail dot com ---

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-04-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Tom Ritter from comment #3) Hi Tom, > However, looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just does a sanity > check to prevent doing something that would be illegal. Ah - you noticed...

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-04-16 Thread tom at ritter dot vg
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 --- Comment #3 from Tom Ritter --- Thanks Nick. With the patch, I no longer get a segfault. However, looking at the patch, it seems to me that it just does a sanity check to prevent doing something that would be illegal. I had thought my

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-04-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/23061] objcopy segfault in coff_mangle_symbols

2018-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23061 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e9af4700bc7435e593dd74d4d2e099b3d7c01eb6 commit