https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25873
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25873
--- Comment #6 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5)
> This might be a fedora specific bug, so try filing a bug there first.
It looks like this is caused by a Fedora specific patch, so I've filed a bug in
the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25873
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
This might be a fedora specific bug, so try filing a bug there first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25873
--- Comment #4 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> Hi Tom,
>
> I am sorry but I cannot reproduce this. It seems very strange that a
> symlink should be causing a segmentation fault when a copy does not.
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25873
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25873
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25873
--- Comment #1 from Tom Stellard ---
It also seems like the LLVMgold.so plugin does not have the same problem. This
similar sequence works with this plugin:
echo "int foo(){}" | clang -flto -O2 -c -x c -o foo.o -
echo "int bar(){}" | clang
