[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

2020-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160

--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d0dded5bc251e506ef65b13696c624ea8669ed6e

commit d0dded5bc251e506ef65b13696c624ea8669ed6e
Author: H.J. Lu 
Date:   Tue Jun 23 09:19:05 2020 -0700

Add a testcase for PR binutils/26160

PR binutils/26160
* testsuite/binutils-all/pr26160.dwp.bz2: New file.
* testsuite/binutils-all/pr26160.r: Likewise.
* testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp: Run PR binutils/26160 test.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

2020-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160

--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=39f381cb80463bd814da549a927bee4643d4ceac

commit 39f381cb80463bd814da549a927bee4643d4ceac
Author: Nick Clifton 
Date:   Tue Jun 23 16:06:38 2020 +0100

Fix decoding of indexed DWARF strings using pre-DWARF-5 string offset
sections.  Fix display of .debug_str_offsets.dwo sections.

PR 26160
* dwarf.c (fetch_indexed_string): Detect and handle old style
.debug_str_offset tables.
(display_debug_str_offsets): Likewise.  Also add support for
.debug_str_offsets.dwo sections.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

2020-06-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160

Nick Clifton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton  ---
Right - this should now be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

2020-06-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160

Nick Clifton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org   |nickc at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton  ---
Hi H.J.

  Sorry about that - this is due to my patch to add support for the
  DW_MACRO_define_strx operand, which is not handling .debug_str_offsets.dwo
  sections correctly.  I have a local patch which I am testing at
  this moment.

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.