https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #5 from nightstrike ---
(In reply to nightstrike from comment #3)
> Ok, I worked around it for now by touching bfd/doc/bfd.info and
> gas/doc/as.info (which also exhibited the problem) in the source dir. I had
> to do this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #4 from nightstrike ---
Looks like this is still a problem with the 2.42 release, at least on an ubuntu
system without makeinfo installed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #3 from nightstrike ---
Ok, I worked around it for now by touching bfd/doc/bfd.info and gas/doc/as.info
(which also exhibited the problem) in the source dir. I had to do this
individually, and before each rebuild. I think the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.40
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #2 from nightstrike ---
Renaming the included texinfo directory to test configure's ability to build
texinfo shows that that doesn't even work anymore:
/bin/sh: line 7:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike ---
It looks like adding texinfo to top level to be built automatically (like isl,
gmp, mpfr, mpc, dejagnu, and a bunch of other stuff) doesn't work OOTB, because
the binutils tarball include a texinfo
