https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
Jeremi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f657f8c4a1dc0ac69b16b1dc6eacbf5286f1f0a0
commit f657f8c4a1dc0ac69b16b1dc6e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=347a87745eab23d8427349787bde4a938a1e8c3e
commit 347a87745eab23d8427349787bde4a93
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
A patc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5)
> Hi H.J.
>
> > The value will be wrong. Linker can only resolve PC relative relocations>
> > against local definition.
> But can't the linker assume that the object
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 10873
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10873&action=edit
Assembler source for the object file
Hi H.J.
Here is the assembler source.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi H.J.
> The value will be wrong. Linker can only resolve PC relative relocations>
> against local definition.
But can't the linker assume that the object is located at address 0 and
resolve the relocat
Hi H.J.
> The value will be wrong. Linker can only resolve PC relative relocations>
> against local definition.
But can't the linker assume that the object is located at address 0 and
resolve the relocations using that ? It does not matter that this address
will not match the run-time address o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> The value will be wrong. Linker can only resolve PC relative relocations
> against local definition.
Agreed. I think we need to fix the producer for these reloca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Hi H.J.
>
> > Since these relocations
> > are in non-allocatable sections, should linker treat them as in
> > debug section?
>
> Ideally not. If I understand the c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi H.J.
> Since these relocations
> are in non-allocatable sections, should linker treat them as in
> debug section?
Ideally not. If I understand the code correctly the debug relocations
are just silentl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|x86_64 linker seg-faults|x86_64 linker seg-faults
13 matches
Mail list logo