[Bug ld/23030] --gc-sections on ia64 removes needed unwind sections

2018-04-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23030 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :

[Bug ld/23030] --gc-sections on ia64 removes needed unwind sections

2018-04-06 Thread jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23030 James Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/23030] --gc-sections on ia64 removes needed unwind sections

2018-04-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23030 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/23030] --gc-sections on ia64 removes needed unwind sections

2018-04-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23030 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=043e9508be0a4ea7ab56fd5716e4c06d609d13be commit

[Bug ld/23030] --gc-sections on ia64 removes needed unwind sections

2018-04-05 Thread jason.duerstock at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23030 --- Comment #2 from Jason Duerstock --- Hi Nick, This appears to have fixed the problem. Thank you for the quick response. Jason -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/23030] --gc-sections on ia64 removes needed unwind sections

2018-04-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23030 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/23030] --gc-sections on ia64 removes needed unwind sections

2018-04-04 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23030 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glaubitz at physik dot