https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
--- Comment #12 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bb9a951fab7a30cc1209c6b8b1716c13456e8b1a
commit bb9a951fab7a30cc1209c6b8b1716c13456e8b1a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
--- Comment #11 from Vladislav Ivanishin ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> Please try:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-12/msg00112.html
Works for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
--- Comment #9 from Vladislav Ivanishin ---
> --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
> Please try users/hjl/lto-mixed/master branch with
>
> commit 08c2f8679f999afaf59d9bc378ef2ff51ed5f40f
> Author: H.J. Lu
> Date: Thu Dec 6 11:45:41 2018 -0800
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
--- Comment #7 from Vladislav Ivanishin ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> The behaviors of with and without -ffat-lto-objects should be the same.
> Either both work or both don't.
Why? I think the behavior of 'with
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
The behaviors of with and without -ffat-lto-objects should be the same.
Either both work or both don't.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
--- Comment #5 from Vladislav Ivanishin ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> (In reply to Vladislav Ivanishin from comment #3)
> > GCC does not tell it needs the printf symbol, because it's a builtin
> > function
> > (prog.c is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Vladislav Ivanishin from comment #3)
> GCC does not tell it needs the printf symbol, because it's a builtin function
> (prog.c is compiled without -fno-builtin).
>
Although printf is a builtin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gmail dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
Vladislav Ivanishin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
Vladislav Ivanishin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld.bfd does not rescan fat |[Regression] ld.bfd does
17 matches
Mail list logo