> On 18 Apr 2018, at 15:56, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> What I'm saying is that Flex 2.5.35 in an Ubuntu installation I'm
> using has this behavior:
>
> /* comment */
> %{
> #include "header.h"
> %}
> /* ... */
>
> The header comment is propagated to the lex.yy.c file. It's
On 2018-04-18 01:36, Hans Åberg wrote:
On 18 Apr 2018, at 02:16, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
(Side note: this is a different behavior from GNU Flex, which passes
through
the comment even if is outside of the %{ ... %} block).
No, it doesn't, not in my code. In some circumstances,
> On 18 Apr 2018, at 02:16, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> On 2018-04-16 13:27, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> On 16 Apr 2018, at 22:01, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>> When Bison turns a .y file into a y.tab.c, it removes any license
>>> header from the .y file, and asserts its own
On 2018-04-16 13:27, Hans Åberg wrote:
On 16 Apr 2018, at 22:01, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
When Bison turns a .y file into a y.tab.c, it removes any license
header from the .y file, and asserts its own license over the file
(which comes from the parser skeleton).
*Replacing* the
> On 16 Apr 2018, at 22:01, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> When Bison turns a .y file into a y.tab.c, it removes any license
> header from the .y file, and asserts its own license over the file
> (which comes from the parser skeleton).
> *Replacing* the copyright notice to assert