BTW This is not working, in case anyone was wondering why there were
no updates showing up on the bug-cfengine list... I don't have any
visibility into the mailing list setup, but when I pointed the mailer
at an alias @explosive.net, SF was sending out mails and gnu.org
was silently dropping t
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, John Sechrest wrote:
> I think one of the key questions is if it makes sense to track the
> bugs in SF. If it does, then we should all be putting them up there.
There are a (relative) lot of people who are using it, and usage is
definitely picking up recently:
2005-06-14 to
Thank you. I think those are good steps.
Eric Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
% I just changed the bug tracker configuration on sourceforge so that
% this list will get emailed whenever activity happens on bugs. It's
% one-way, in that email traffic about a bug will not get appended
I think one of the key questions is if it makes sense to track the
bugs in SF. If it does, then we should all be putting them up there.
Is there something we can do that will make using the SF bug tracker
easier?
Eric Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
% I just changed the bug tracker conf
I just changed the bug tracker configuration on sourceforge so that
this list will get emailed whenever activity happens on bugs. It's
one-way, in that email traffic about a bug will not get appended to
that bug's tracker entry, but it should help track when new things are
added and so forth.
